The Quick Read
The European Commission has formally backed smarter tools for grassroots sport. But the conditions it sets expose a hard truth: the platforms grassroots football has been stuck with were never built for coaches.
Key Intelligence
30-Second Summary
A recent paper from the European Commission's SHARE 2.0 initiative has formally endorsed AI adoption in grassroots sport, citing volunteer burnout, financial pressure, and outdated tools as systemic problems. But it also sets clear conditions: transparency, usability for volunteers, and respect for data privacy. For UK grassroots football coaches, this is both validation and a warning. The opportunity is real. The hype is too. Knowing the difference matters.
The Signal
The European Commission doesn't usually have much to say about your Sunday morning touchline. But a paper published through its SHARE 2.0 initiative landed squarely in grassroots territory, and coaches should pay attention.
The paper, Artificial Intelligence in the Sport Sector, isn't a vague policy document about elite performance labs and Formula 1 telemetry. It directly addresses the reality of volunteer-run clubs: stretched coaches, fragmented admin, financial pressure, and tools that create more work than they remove. And it makes a clear statement: grassroots sport deserves better. But only if the tools are built the right way.
That last part is where things get interesting. Because the conditions the paper sets don't describe most of what's currently being sold to grassroots coaches. They describe something fundamentally different.
The Pattern
The EU paper draws on a major European survey of sport clubs to quantify what every grassroots coach already knows. Clubs identified their biggest problems as access to facilities, recruiting volunteers, finances, and finding coaches. Nearly two-thirds of grassroots clubs surveyed reported financial difficulties. Households provide the majority of grassroots sport funding, while sponsorship accounts for barely two per cent.
The paper doesn't frame it this way, but read across its findings and a clear pattern emerges. The examples and recommendations it covers fall into three areas that any grassroots coach will recognise: management, performance, and experience.
On management, the paper is blunt. Daily club operations involve repetitive administrative tasks - registrations, payments, communication - and these are typically handled by volunteers. Tools that automate messages, handle scheduling, and manage routine processes are being used by some grassroots clubs across Europe. This is where the most immediate impact lies: freeing volunteers to spend time on sport rather than drowning in admin.
On performance, the paper highlights the ability of intelligent tools to support coaches with tactical insights, formation analysis, and training recommendations built from match data. Not replacing coaching instinct, but giving it evidence to work with. The emphasis is always on the coach remaining in control, with technology surfacing patterns that would take hours of manual review to spot.
On experience, the paper points to how smarter tools can improve communication between clubs and their communities - from automated content generation to better engagement with supporters and the wider network around a team. In grassroots terms, that's match reports that actually get shared, updates that actually reach parents, and content that celebrates players without adding another job to the coach's evening.
AI tools can minimise the workload associated with administrative tasks, allowing time and energy to be spent on activities directly related to sport.
The paper also flags something that deserves a closer read. It identifies "recruitment of coaches" as a top concern across European clubs. But anyone who's lived through a grassroots season knows the real problem isn't recruitment. It's retention. Coaches don't quit because they stop loving football. They quit because the admin burden makes volunteering feel like an unpaid office job. Fix the admin, and you fix a significant part of the retention crisis. The EU paper frames this as a recruitment challenge. We'd argue it's a retention problem that looks like a recruitment problem - and that's an important distinction, because the solutions are different.
The AFC Grassroots Conference reinforced this from the coaching education side. Consultant Robin Russell, who has been piloting AI assistants for coach development, described the real value as reaching coaches who cannot access formal courses and providing ongoing support between qualifications. His pilots use technology trained on federation content to answer coaches' questions, generate session ideas, and even analyse the audio from training sessions to show how often a coach asked questions or used players' names. The emphasis is always the same: support for human coaching, not a replacement for it.
The Practice
The EU paper's recommendations, combined with what's actually working on the ground, point to a clear framework for coaches evaluating the tools available to them. Here are four questions every grassroots coach should ask before committing their club to any platform:
1. Does it actually reduce your workload, or just move it?
This is the first test and the most important. A tool that requires you to upload footage after every session, manually tag events, and then interpret a dashboard full of metrics is not reducing admin. It's creating a second job. The EU paper explicitly warns that data collection and maintenance demands can pose significant barriers to effective adoption. The best tools capture data through the workflows you already follow - tracking a match, recording attendance, building a formation - and surface insights automatically. If it needs a data scientist, it's not built for you.
2. Can you explain, in plain English, how it uses your players' data?
The paper flags data protection as a critical concern, particularly for youth sport. Many platforms licence their technology from third-party providers, which means player data can end up being shared with companies coaches have never heard of, potentially outside the UK. If you can't get a straight answer about where your data goes, who sees it, and how it's stored, that's not a tool you should be giving your U12s' information to. Look for UK-hosted data, clear GDPR compliance, and transparent policies.
3. Could a new volunteer use it after a ten-minute introduction?
Digital skills gaps are real. The EU paper identifies them as one of the primary barriers to adoption in grassroots sport. If your tool requires training sessions of its own before anyone can use it, you'll lose half your coaching team before the season starts. The interface should feel familiar. Actions should be obvious. And it should work on whatever phone happens to be in the coach's pocket on match day.
4. Does it respect what good youth football actually looks like?
This is the one most tools fail completely. England Football's Future Fit reforms are reshaping youth football from 2026-27, with smaller formats, delayed 11v11, and a renewed emphasis on enjoyment and development over results. Platforms that push performance dashboards, player ratings, and selection algorithms at U9 level are working against the grain of where the game is heading. Good tools for grassroots football should support age-appropriate coaching, not undermine it with metrics designed for senior squads.
The Principle
Here's what the European Commission paper really exposes: the grassroots football tool market has been built backwards.
Most platforms start with what's technically impressive - or worse, what's easiest to monetise - and then look for a grassroots customer who might pay for it. The result is products designed to impress committees and conference audiences, not to survive contact with a muddy touchline, a borrowed phone, and a coach who has fifteen minutes between the final whistle and locking up.
The EU paper calls for something different. It recommends local working groups to test solutions on a small scale, federation-vetted tools that clubs can trust, training programmes for volunteers, and shared resources that make elite coaching knowledge accessible at grassroots level. That's not a technology-first approach. It's a people-first approach that happens to use technology.
Management, performance, experience. The EU paper covers all three without connecting them. We think that's the missing insight. They aren't separate problems. They're the same problem seen from different angles. A coach buried in admin can't prepare properly for Saturday. A team with no tactical insight can't develop. A club that can't communicate match results, celebrate players, or keep parents informed can't build the community that sustains it. The tools that will actually transform grassroots football are the ones that connect these three areas in a single, simple system - not the ones that solve one while ignoring the others.
At tactico, this is the principle we started with. Intelligence should work behind the scenes, not demand attention. It should surface insight from the data coaches already generate - formations, match events, attendance, selections - without adding a single extra task. Our automated match reports don't just save coaches thirty minutes on a Sunday evening; they give parents, players, and club committees a professional window into the team's story. That's management, performance, and experience in one action. We're building training plan support into the platform soon, because that's where coaches told us they need help next.
The EU paper validates what we've believed from the start: grassroots football deserves intelligence. But it deserves intelligence built for the people who actually run the game, not intelligence built around the people who fund the tools.
Your Move This Week
Take thirty minutes this week and honestly appraise the tools your club is using right now. Whether that's a legacy tool, a spreadsheet, a WhatsApp group, or all three held together with good intentions.
Ask yourself: where are they adding admin rather than removing it? What insights are they giving you back? Where are the gaps between what you need on match day and what you've actually got?
You don't need to change anything yet. Just notice. Because better tools are now within reach for grassroots football - tools that give time back instead of demanding more of it. The first step is recognising where your current setup is costing you hours you could be spending on coaching - and frustrating you, your coaches, your players, and your community in the process.
The Bottom Line
Europe is paying attention to grassroots football. That matters.
Not because we need permission from Brussels to coach on a Sunday morning. But because when institutions with this reach say the same thing coaches have been saying for years - the admin is killing us, the tools aren't good enough, we deserve better - it adds weight.
Better tools are coming to every grassroots club. That's not a question any more.
The only question is whether they arrive as another burden or as genuine relief.
Demand tools built for coaches, not for pitch decks.
Demand transparency, not black boxes.
Demand intelligence that respects the game.
Sources & Context
1. Primary: Artificial Intelligence in the Sport Sector - A paper from the SHARE 2.0 initiative, European Commission, September 2025 (download the full report)
2. Data: European survey of sport clubs - availability of facilities (27.6%), volunteer recruitment (26.9%), finances (24.2%), coach recruitment (24.2%) cited as primary concerns (referenced in SHARE 2.0 paper)
3. Supporting: Seippel, O., et al. (2020). "In Troubled Water? European Sports Clubs: Their Problems, Capacities and Opportunities." Journal of Global Sport Management, 8(1), 203-225
4. Supporting: Eurostrategies (2011). Study on the funding of grassroots sports in the EU - Publications Office of the European Union
5. Supporting: Robin Russell, AFC Grassroots Conference - AI coaching assistant pilots including session audio analysis and federation-trained chatbots (AFC Coaches' Circle Issue 15)
6. Supporting: England Football - FutureFit: Updates to grassroots youth football, February 2025
7. Supporting: ENGSO Youth (2022). Position Paper: Impact of digital technologies on grassroots sport with focus on AI
First published: 17 February 2026
tactico.
The game, uncompromised.
š Get early access